WASHINGTON (Oct. 3) - Americans are becoming increasingly house
poor.
Homeowners in every state but one spent more of their incomes on
housing costs last year than at the start of the decade, according
to data released Tuesday by the Census Bureau. Those in Alaska
spent the same.
Nationwide, homeowners spent nearly 21 percent of their incomes
on housing costs last year, up from just under 19 percent in 1999.
Housing analysts blamed surging home prices, higher interest
rates and lower incomes for hurting affordability.
"It is now much more difficult for first-time homebuyers to get
into the market, and for existing homeowners to trade up," said
Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Economy.com. "This decline
in affordability is the catalyst for the current sharp decline in
housing activity."
The housing market has gone soft in many areas, but home prices
are still much higher than they were at the start of the decade.
Nationwide, median home values jumped 32 percent from 2000 to 2005,
to $167,500.
Household incomes have not kept up, dropping 2.8 percent during
the same period.
"Until incomes catch up, the housing market is going to remain
flat," Zandi said.
America's home ownership rate is at a near-record 68.7 percent.
But some housing advocates warn that declining affordability will
make it difficult for low-income owners to keep their homes.
For example, the government says housing costs are excessive if
they top 30 percent of household income. Nationally, 34.5 percent
of homeowners with a mortgage had housing costs that topped that
benchmark in 2005, an increase from 26.7 percent in 1999.
The percentage of homeowners exceeding the benchmark increased
in every state but one during the period. In Hawaii, it stayed the
same at 39.7 percent.
Housing costs are defined as mortgage payments, taxes, insurance
and utilities.
"Families want to become homeowners and they are willing to
spend more to get there," said Jeffrey Lubell, executive director
for the Center for Housing Policy, which advocates for affordable
housing.
"But as they spend more and more, they are taking on mortgages
that could put their homeownership at risk," Lubell said.
The Census Bureau released 2005 housing data from the American
Community Survey, which is replacing the "long form" on the
10-year census. Starting this year, the annual survey of about 3
million households provides yearly data on communities of 65,000 or
larger. By 2010, it will provide annual multiyear averages for the
smallest neighborhoods covered by the 10-year census.
The Census Bureau previously released data in incomes, poverty,
race and ethnicity.
California stands out among the states with expensive housing
costs. It ranked No. 1 in median home value, at $477,700; No. 2 in
monthly housing costs for homeowners, at $1,912; and No. 2 in
monthly costs for renters, at $973.
Nearly half of California homeowners - 48 percent - spent more
than 30 percent of their incomes on housing last year.
"We really are reaching the outer edge of the envelope of what
people can manage," said Cynthia Kroll, senior regional economist
at the University of California at Berkeley.
Among the other findings released Tuesday:
New Jersey had the highest monthly housing costs for
homeowners, at $1,938.
West Virginia had the least expensive monthly costs for
homeowners, at $797.
Hawaii had the highest monthly costs for renters, at $995.
North Dakota had the lowest monthly costs for renters, at $479.
Mississippi had the least expensive median home value, at
$82,700.
Among America's 15 largest cities, San Francisco had the most
expensive homes, with a median value of $726,700. Detroit had the
least expensive, at $88,300.
San Diego had the biggest increase in median home values from
2000 to 2005, going from $249,000 to $567,000.