The original living room and galley kitchen carry Wright's signature elements: stained concrete floors, concrete-block walls, large windows and natural wood, with built-in bookshelves designed in place and fixed along the walls. The addition houses a second, larger kitchen, a wing of kids' bedrooms and a master suite.
Wright was famously uninterested in collaborating with clients, but The New York Times reported that Thaxton talked the architect out of having the swimming pool run under the wall into the master bedroom. (The pool abuts the master, instead).
Thaxton paid the architect $25,000, and Wright designed the house with minimal input. "It was sort of a bring your toothbrush kind of situation," Harburg said.
The home, which is in Houston's swanky Bunker Hills Village, is one of only three Wright-designed private residences in Texas. The others are in Dallas and Amarillo. The modern architect also designed the Dallas Theater Center.
The home has been on the market at least twice before, most recently in 2011 for $2.9 million.
I would just love a home to take care of even a tiny one!!
I hate to say it but this 'purist' isn't madly in love with what's been done to it now.
My 1890 6 unit building in San Francisco was either built as a Mission Revival building, or Victorian like ALL the buildings around it. We think it was born a Victorian and rebuilt later as Mission Revival. It was done so well, that it has been identified as a Mission Revival building and we only knew it wasn't because the water was turned on in 1890, before Mission Revival. It is unique in the area, and people stop to take its picture. I'm in a historic district with a lot of tourists. Changing a building, if done well, is not always bad. Knowing that it was changed, I went looking for the original building. I don't think it was special. The bay windows were kept in a different form, but beams coming out from the lowest floor above the garage put in 1933 were added. Islamic/Spanish arches were added with beautiful Spanish tiles. There is a turret like addition on the top, and Spanish roof tiles. All apparent in Mission Revival. There are wooden beams in the large entry hall you enter through an arch and a arched door. It all screams Mission Revival. When I bought it, I found a large Mexican carpet and hung it from the beams on the empty wall leading to the stairs which give it even more of an Hispanic feel. I've invited tourists in to look and they are always blown away by it.
While I'm sure the click-bait headline writer for AOL 'News" doesm't know the difference, there is a real BIG one between Frank Lloyd Wright's actual house and a Frank Lloyd Wright house being saved from the wrecking ball.Just wondering, but if the AOL digital writers expect us to read these stories, shouldn't they read them?Regards,TSB
My father, a stone mason, purchased a house built in 1848...he restored it meticulously back to its original condition; the house was on the Tennessee register of historic places as it had also served as a tavern. Years after he restored it he had to sell it. The buyer took down both great brick chimneys (bricks were made locally in the 1840's) and sold them to a developer. Took down the original shutters with hangers and replaced them with cheap fake shutters...and sold the real, shutters. He took out the original wide planked, cherry floors, sold them and replaced them with carpet. Some people do not care a damn bit about real art and history. Their god is the dollar.
What kind of pin-headed idiot would ruin a piece of history by painting it and putting fruit on it?
While FLW was an awsome and creative architect, his residential architecture lacked the warmth that we all need and long for both to relax in and to entertain. Most of his residential show places were occupied by their owners for a very short time after the hooplah of attention dissipated. FLW designed to showcase himself, not his clients' needs. Architects are in a service profession not a self-service ego journey; if a spectacle provides function, I am all for it and Wright's commercial projects are an appropriate success and beauty in that area. His residential designs are not.
"lacked the warmth that we all need and long for both to relax in and to entertain. "Who is "WE"?? You don't speak for the world.
I have seen a few Wright designed buildings, but if I hadn't been told this was one, I'd never have guessed. One thing about his buildings: most of them had major design (or workmanship) issues. A lot of them leaked. His use of unusual roof lines was part of the problem: they couldn't handle real world weather. I do so love the prairie design windows, though. (Not on this house.)
The fact that the new owners modified it with add ons etc reduces it from a house sized work of art to ordinary.If you own a Frank Wright house, don't change any of it, please.
Room of the Day: Warming to a Contemporary Family Space
Tapping Into Home Equity the Right Way -- and the Wrong Way
Space Planner Makes Room for a New Life in a Modern Home
For Sale: Daryl Hannah's Hippie-Chic Malibu Retreat
House of the Day: Family Made This Dome a Free-Spirited Home
'Real Housewife' Teresa Giudice Dumps Another Home on Market
Is Your Dog on the Insurance Blacklist?
Here's How Much Home $400,000 Buys Now Across America
Prison-Bound 'Real Housewife' Teresa Giudice Lists NJ Home